Looking for:

Hi-res music streaming services compared: which should you sign up for? | What Hi-Fi?

Click here to Download

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

You also have the option to add 2TB of internal storage, although this increases the cost considerably. The 2. Most of these are internal, and you can definitely hear the difference when you compare the systems side-by-side. See the Auralic Aries G2. The Aurender A10 is the second most expensive streamer on this list, and it certainly brings a lot to the table. It has two key features. The first of these is dedicated MQA decoding, which means it’s ideal for those who love streaming music from Tidal.

The second is its absolutely enormous hard drive. With four terabytes to play with, you’ll be able to store an absolutely massive collection of music on there, and access it via the outstanding Aurender Conductor app.

However, the app is also the A10’s Achilles heel. For some reason, and one we can’t quite fathom, it is only available on iPad — not iPhone, and definitely not Android. There are other problems, too. The screen on the front of the A10 feels miserly and small; it always feels like you have to squint to see what information is being displayed. And even a year or two after its initial release, the A10 is still not Roon Ready. Because of these issues, we don’t think it’s the best choice for high-end streaming — that would be the NAD Masters M However, it definitely has its uses for those in need of MQA decoding and an outrageous amount of storage.

See the Aurender A The Portuguese company clearly places a lot of emphasis on design, and it helps that the feature set here is top-notch. You not only get a CD ripper with 1 TB of internal storage, but also full streaming capability from just about any service you can think of.

And while there is no digital display, there is innuOS, one of the best music library management apps not named Roon. In short: solid range of features, for a relatively friendly price. The Texas Instruments chipset gets the job done, but it never felt as nuanced or clean as we would have liked.

This is a system that works much better if you have an external DAC, which you can feed via the optical output.

What We Don’t: Clunky and frustrating setup, unintuitive app. And, finally, the audio has a real edge, with clean and dynamic detail. However, there are real downsides that make the Andover Audio Songbird an alternative, rather than the first option.

Primarily, this has to do with the app used to control the Songbird. Setting it up is a tricky, finicky process, with frequent restarts due to glitches in dropouts. If you value high-res streaming and sound quality, and are prepared to put up with the frustrations, then the Songbird is a good choice. But Andover have a long way to go before they can compete.

See the Andover Audio Songbird. What We Don’t: Wi-Fi issues, limited inputs. It may be more mass-marketed than most streamers on this list, but the Sonos Amp absolutely deserves to be here. This model is also a total breeze to set up. We did have a few issues with our test model. Chief among these issues were Wi-Fi dropouts, which were frustratingly common, despite flawless connection on other devices.

However, we would still rate it in our top ten, and can honestly say we had a blast testing it. Read our in-depth review See the Sonos Amp. However, while the NAD M10 has excellent features, we felt just a tad let down by the sound quality. While the NAD M10 delivers excellent audio for the price, when compared to the Naim Uniti Atom, we just felt like there was something missing. Regardless, the M10 has plenty to recommend about it. See the NAD M It has a huge range of features, including not only the ability to stream from just about any service you like, but also to play CDs and access NAS drives.

If you listen to a mix of CDs and streaming music, this is the model to go for. The biggest downside with the SACD30n is the app it uses for control.

Other models like the NAD M10 put it to shame in this regard. And not Roon Ready? At this price? Come on. Denon have traditionally made gear that looks quite frumpy compared to other models, but the PMAH is a welcome exception. We love the sleek look and little details like the recessed rear inputs section. The interface is simple, but effective, and offers an excellent range of features. The sound is good, but can come across as a bit thin and analytical. We prefer the Marantz PMN, which sounds more full.

This is an excellent start for Denon, and a great way to shake off the dowdy image, but they have some improvements to make with this model before it places higher on this list.

What We Don’t: Atrocious looks and build quality. The Marantz PMN is all about sound quality. The result is a sound that beats several other streamers on this list, including more expensive ones from Denon and Primare. The Marantz PMN has a ridiculously wide soundstage and delivers audio that feels clean and crisp. Despite the stellar sound, there is one big black mark for the Marantz PMN.

Ugly buttons, zero imagination, and poor display make this music streamer hard to look at. See the Marantz PMN. You’re kidding, right?

Linn make some absolutely superb music streamers, and we think the Selekt DSM is our favorite. You’ll definitely pay for the privilege — it’s the most expensive streamer in our list, far more so than the Naim Uniti Atom.

But the Selekt DSM manages to hold its own, offering an excellent range features. We also adore the sound quality. There’s no amplifier, although you do have the option to upgrade to one if you choose to.

The audio quality from the internal circuitry is lively and dynamic, and great fun to listen to. But here’s the catch. Yes, you get Ethernet, and Wi-Fi compatibility is being added on at a later date As good as this streamer is, you may want to wait a while before investing your hard earned dollars. The Bryston BDA Bryston products have always put sound quality overlooks, and while the BDA It matches up well with other similarly priced streamers like the Auralic Aries G2.

The BDA These are useful if you plan to make this stream are the hub of your home entertainment system and TV sound. Bryston say they are planning to correct this with a future update, but at this price point, it feels like something rushed to market a little too fast. The BDA 3.

See the Bryston BDA What We Don’t: Sound is a little dull. Then again, the DS-AG is a solid entry to the market. It looks superb, with its offset display and industrial aesthetic, and we appreciate the range of features. The audio quality is fine, but unexciting, and we kept wishing for more liveliness — especially in the bass. This is doubly surprising given how competent the app is, and the room calibration settings it offers.

How do we explain the Chord 2Go? Because it does take some explaining. Got that? Do you see what we mean when we say this is weirdly specific? We also really appreciate the auto switching function for inputs. You never need to manually change your input — just press play on your chosen source. The clever design makes the 2Go a winner, although there are definitely better options available for most people. See the Chord Electronics 2Go.

For starters, you probably already have a music streamer. You may even be reading this article on it. Your smartphone actually qualifies as a music streamer. It is capable of taking audio files stored in another location, like a music streaming service, and playing them. It won’t necessarily do a brilliant job — its internal circuitry, like its Digital-to-Analog Converter DAC , probably cost less than a dollar to manufacture – but by the strictest standards of what qualifies as a music streamer, it is one.

Think about that for a second. Think of how useful it is to be able to retrieve music this way, without necessarily having to rely on physical media. If you are serious about your music, then you want this retrieval to be as seamless as possible.

You want to extract the maximum amount of information from that audio file, no matter where it is located. You don’t want there to be any weak links in your audio chain, which means thinking about how you actually retrieve your music. A dedicated music streamer is the answer here: a single-box solution that can make sure your music is delivered in the purest possible way.

In many cases, you don’t even have to put down your phone to use them: almost all of the options on our list above come with a control app, which makes selecting and playing music a breeze. And if you don’t believe us, if you think this kind of audio product is a total waste of money, then we have a suggestion for you.

We guarantee you’ll be wanting something a little bit more intense before long — and once you’re sucked in, you won’t believe just how rewarding music streamers can be. You’ll see the term thrown around a lot in the world of music streaming and high-end audio, so it’s worth taking a minute or two to understand the difference between a DAC and a music streamer.

A DAC’s job is to convert a digital music file into an analog signal ; to take the 1s and 0s that make up a file, and convert them into an electrical impulse that the human ear can actually pick up. What it does not do is actually retrieve music from anywhere.

It will take any file you feed it, and convert it into an audible signal, but it will not actually go and hunt down its own food. That’s what a music streamer is for. The confusion comes because of the fact that many music streamers have DACs included in them, meaning they can both retrieve and convert audio. It has the ability to both stream music and to convert it to an analog signal – something it shares with many of the streamers on our list.

It pushes this signal through a set of analog outputs, meaning you can connect it directly to an amplifier or a set of powered speakers. But — and this is the clever part — it also contains digital outputs, meaning you can bypass its DAC entirely. You’d do this if you have a DAC already, one you are comfortable with and wish to continue to use. Essentially, what you need to understand is that a streamer and a DAC are two separate things, but it is entirely possible for them to both be contained in the same box.

By the way, you will sometimes see companies marketing their products as streaming DACs. They do this because they like confusing people. We kid: it’s because they wish to market their product as a DAC, first and foremost, only one that has streaming capabilities.

For all intents and purposes, you can consider these music streamers. But if we are talking streaming audio, then our wish would be for companies to agree, once and for all, on the terms they are going to use. Nothing is more confusing than stumbling across the term network player, and wondering if it means the same thing as music streamer, or if it’s something different, and whether or not a music server will actually stream music.

So let’s demystify this, once and for all. The key thing to bear in mind is that music streamers and network players are exactly the same thing.

There is literally no difference. The terms can be used interchangeably. You’ll also sometimes see them called things like network media players, media streamers, and delightful whizbang machines one of those is made up. That location can be a Spotify playlist, a hard drive, a USB stick, anything – as long as it’s not actually contained in the housing of the music streamer itself. Our top music streamer, if you haven’t read yet, is the stupendous — and stupendously expensive — Naim Uniti Atom.

A music server is slightly different. It contains an internal hard drive, on which you can store music files. A dedicated music server will not have the ability to retrieve audio from elsewhere — all the audio will come from files stored on its internal drive.

The best of these have a CD ripper, and they are absolutely ideal if you want to convert a CD collection to digital files in high quality. We made a conscious choice not to include music servers on our list above. NAS stands for Network Attached Storage, and it’s a term you’ll see often when looking at music streamers.

A NAS drive is a hard drive, or a bank of hard drives, connected directly to your router via an ethernet cable. You can store anything on these drives — photos, videos, whatever, including music.

What this means is that you can use a NAS drive as a giant library for your music streamer to wirelessly pull from. It’s ideal if you’ve converted your physical music collection to digital and need somewhere to store the files. You might reasonably ask why you would use a NAS drive instead of storing your files on the cloud. For starters, you don’t need to rely on a Wi-Fi connection to upload or download them. You also won’t have to pay for additional space if you exceed limits — something you are unlikely to do with the physical hard drive, which is often much larger than a cloud server.

Storing files and retrieving them can be a lot quicker, and that means you are less likely to have a dropout when playing music from a music streamer.

Setting up a NAS drive and getting it to work with your streamer is a bit beyond the scope of what we want to do here, but there are several guides online.

It’s essentially a common language between devices, allowing them to talk to each other. They can discover each other on a home network, and access certain services. If a music streamer is set up for uPnP, it means you will be able to directly access any uPnP servers you have nearby on the same network, and control the files on them. This makes for an easy and effective way of dealing with huge troves of files. A NAS drive is an actual physical thing, whereas uPnP is a method for that physical thing to talk to another physical thing.

It’s a piece of software, and if you can get a handle on it, it works very well. We don’t really want to go into how to set up a uPnP server here — there are plenty of ways to do it, and it’s a little bit outside of the scope of this article. Be warned: not all music streamers have the ability to use uPnP, so definitely check before you buy.

One additional wrinkle. You will sometimes see the term DLNA. This stands for Digital Living Network Alliance, and it’s an actual organisation with people who work in it. It was created to define standards for digital media transmission, and it uses — you guessed it — uPnP. We actually have a full explainer that breaks down not only how audio files work and what they’re made of, but just about every file type you can imagine.

However, that explainer is for a much more general audience, and deals with file types you probably won’t find on many streamers such as straight-up MP3s, for example.

So, let’s take the time to very briefly explain what audio files are made up of, and which ones you are likely to encounter if you buy a music streamer. There are two main things you need to know about a music streamer, and those two things are the largest bit depth and sample rate it can take.

Sample rate refers to the amount of times a computer has taken a digital snapshot of a specific second of a music file — obviously, the more snapshots it takes, the more detailed the audio will be.

You’ll find this measured in Hertz Hz , with the occasional abbreviation of kiloHertz kHz , or a thousand Hertz. Bit depth refers to how much information is found in each snapshot, and again, the higher the number, the better.

As you can imagine, those numbers are pretty good! There are many different types of audio files available, but the most common in the world of music streamers, we’d argue, are FLAC and MQA files. This is because these are the files used by the streaming service Tidal, which is easily among the most popular and wide-ranging high resolution streaming service — although it is being challenged by startups like Qobuz.

This means they are both quick to stream, and suitably detailed. It uses some truly magical digital wizardry to deliver a very high quality file that is also slim enough to be streamed without interruption. See the Marantz PMN. You’re kidding, right? Linn make some absolutely superb music streamers, and we think the Selekt DSM is our favorite. You’ll definitely pay for the privilege — it’s the most expensive streamer in our list, far more so than the Naim Uniti Atom.

But the Selekt DSM manages to hold its own, offering an excellent range features. We also adore the sound quality. There’s no amplifier, although you do have the option to upgrade to one if you choose to. The audio quality from the internal circuitry is lively and dynamic, and great fun to listen to. But here’s the catch. Yes, you get Ethernet, and Wi-Fi compatibility is being added on at a later date As good as this streamer is, you may want to wait a while before investing your hard earned dollars.

The Bryston BDA Bryston products have always put sound quality overlooks, and while the BDA It matches up well with other similarly priced streamers like the Auralic Aries G2.

The BDA These are useful if you plan to make this stream are the hub of your home entertainment system and TV sound. Bryston say they are planning to correct this with a future update, but at this price point, it feels like something rushed to market a little too fast. The BDA 3. See the Bryston BDA What We Don’t: Sound is a little dull. Then again, the DS-AG is a solid entry to the market.

It looks superb, with its offset display and industrial aesthetic, and we appreciate the range of features. The audio quality is fine, but unexciting, and we kept wishing for more liveliness — especially in the bass. This is doubly surprising given how competent the app is, and the room calibration settings it offers. How do we explain the Chord 2Go? Because it does take some explaining.

Got that? Do you see what we mean when we say this is weirdly specific? We also really appreciate the auto switching function for inputs. You never need to manually change your input — just press play on your chosen source. The clever design makes the 2Go a winner, although there are definitely better options available for most people. See the Chord Electronics 2Go. For starters, you probably already have a music streamer. You may even be reading this article on it.

Your smartphone actually qualifies as a music streamer. It is capable of taking audio files stored in another location, like a music streaming service, and playing them. It won’t necessarily do a brilliant job — its internal circuitry, like its Digital-to-Analog Converter DAC , probably cost less than a dollar to manufacture – but by the strictest standards of what qualifies as a music streamer, it is one.

Think about that for a second. Think of how useful it is to be able to retrieve music this way, without necessarily having to rely on physical media. If you are serious about your music, then you want this retrieval to be as seamless as possible.

You want to extract the maximum amount of information from that audio file, no matter where it is located. You don’t want there to be any weak links in your audio chain, which means thinking about how you actually retrieve your music.

A dedicated music streamer is the answer here: a single-box solution that can make sure your music is delivered in the purest possible way. In many cases, you don’t even have to put down your phone to use them: almost all of the options on our list above come with a control app, which makes selecting and playing music a breeze. And if you don’t believe us, if you think this kind of audio product is a total waste of money, then we have a suggestion for you.

We guarantee you’ll be wanting something a little bit more intense before long — and once you’re sucked in, you won’t believe just how rewarding music streamers can be. You’ll see the term thrown around a lot in the world of music streaming and high-end audio, so it’s worth taking a minute or two to understand the difference between a DAC and a music streamer.

A DAC’s job is to convert a digital music file into an analog signal ; to take the 1s and 0s that make up a file, and convert them into an electrical impulse that the human ear can actually pick up. What it does not do is actually retrieve music from anywhere. It will take any file you feed it, and convert it into an audible signal, but it will not actually go and hunt down its own food. That’s what a music streamer is for. The confusion comes because of the fact that many music streamers have DACs included in them, meaning they can both retrieve and convert audio.

It has the ability to both stream music and to convert it to an analog signal – something it shares with many of the streamers on our list. It pushes this signal through a set of analog outputs, meaning you can connect it directly to an amplifier or a set of powered speakers.

But — and this is the clever part — it also contains digital outputs, meaning you can bypass its DAC entirely. You’d do this if you have a DAC already, one you are comfortable with and wish to continue to use. Essentially, what you need to understand is that a streamer and a DAC are two separate things, but it is entirely possible for them to both be contained in the same box.

By the way, you will sometimes see companies marketing their products as streaming DACs. They do this because they like confusing people. We kid: it’s because they wish to market their product as a DAC, first and foremost, only one that has streaming capabilities. For all intents and purposes, you can consider these music streamers.

But if we are talking streaming audio, then our wish would be for companies to agree, once and for all, on the terms they are going to use. Nothing is more confusing than stumbling across the term network player, and wondering if it means the same thing as music streamer, or if it’s something different, and whether or not a music server will actually stream music. So let’s demystify this, once and for all.

The key thing to bear in mind is that music streamers and network players are exactly the same thing. There is literally no difference. The terms can be used interchangeably. You’ll also sometimes see them called things like network media players, media streamers, and delightful whizbang machines one of those is made up.

That location can be a Spotify playlist, a hard drive, a USB stick, anything – as long as it’s not actually contained in the housing of the music streamer itself. Our top music streamer, if you haven’t read yet, is the stupendous — and stupendously expensive — Naim Uniti Atom. A music server is slightly different. It contains an internal hard drive, on which you can store music files.

A dedicated music server will not have the ability to retrieve audio from elsewhere — all the audio will come from files stored on its internal drive.

The best of these have a CD ripper, and they are absolutely ideal if you want to convert a CD collection to digital files in high quality. We made a conscious choice not to include music servers on our list above.

NAS stands for Network Attached Storage, and it’s a term you’ll see often when looking at music streamers. A NAS drive is a hard drive, or a bank of hard drives, connected directly to your router via an ethernet cable. You can store anything on these drives — photos, videos, whatever, including music. What this means is that you can use a NAS drive as a giant library for your music streamer to wirelessly pull from. It’s ideal if you’ve converted your physical music collection to digital and need somewhere to store the files.

You might reasonably ask why you would use a NAS drive instead of storing your files on the cloud. For starters, you don’t need to rely on a Wi-Fi connection to upload or download them. You also won’t have to pay for additional space if you exceed limits — something you are unlikely to do with the physical hard drive, which is often much larger than a cloud server.

Storing files and retrieving them can be a lot quicker, and that means you are less likely to have a dropout when playing music from a music streamer.

Setting up a NAS drive and getting it to work with your streamer is a bit beyond the scope of what we want to do here, but there are several guides online. It’s essentially a common language between devices, allowing them to talk to each other.

They can discover each other on a home network, and access certain services. If a music streamer is set up for uPnP, it means you will be able to directly access any uPnP servers you have nearby on the same network, and control the files on them.

This makes for an easy and effective way of dealing with huge troves of files. A NAS drive is an actual physical thing, whereas uPnP is a method for that physical thing to talk to another physical thing. It’s a piece of software, and if you can get a handle on it, it works very well. We don’t really want to go into how to set up a uPnP server here — there are plenty of ways to do it, and it’s a little bit outside of the scope of this article.

Be warned: not all music streamers have the ability to use uPnP, so definitely check before you buy. One additional wrinkle. You will sometimes see the term DLNA. This stands for Digital Living Network Alliance, and it’s an actual organisation with people who work in it. It was created to define standards for digital media transmission, and it uses — you guessed it — uPnP.

We actually have a full explainer that breaks down not only how audio files work and what they’re made of, but just about every file type you can imagine. However, that explainer is for a much more general audience, and deals with file types you probably won’t find on many streamers such as straight-up MP3s, for example.

So, let’s take the time to very briefly explain what audio files are made up of, and which ones you are likely to encounter if you buy a music streamer. There are two main things you need to know about a music streamer, and those two things are the largest bit depth and sample rate it can take.

Sample rate refers to the amount of times a computer has taken a digital snapshot of a specific second of a music file — obviously, the more snapshots it takes, the more detailed the audio will be. You’ll find this measured in Hertz Hz , with the occasional abbreviation of kiloHertz kHz , or a thousand Hertz. Bit depth refers to how much information is found in each snapshot, and again, the higher the number, the better.

As you can imagine, those numbers are pretty good! There are many different types of audio files available, but the most common in the world of music streamers, we’d argue, are FLAC and MQA files. This is because these are the files used by the streaming service Tidal, which is easily among the most popular and wide-ranging high resolution streaming service — although it is being challenged by startups like Qobuz. This means they are both quick to stream, and suitably detailed. It uses some truly magical digital wizardry to deliver a very high quality file that is also slim enough to be streamed without interruption.

If you have a music streamer, these are the two file types you’ll encounter the most — although you may wish to experiment with DSD, which is a whole different ball game. Check out the explainer linked above for a full breakdown of that. When we talk about Google’s Chromecast and Apple’s AirPlay 2, we are referring to two different transmission protocols.

They are simple and effective ways of sending audio from a mobile device to a music streamer — or a TV, wireless speaker, or video streaming stick. However, that’s not the case.

Both AirPlay 2 and Chromecast are available on multiple different streamer models and brands, and using either of them is as easy as selecting your streamer as a source. It must be said that, for most music streamers, you won’t encounter either of them unless you absolutely want to. This is because most streamers on our list have the ability to access services like Spotify and Tidal direct, without having to rely on an external mobile device to do the streaming for them.

As such, there’s no you need to use either transmission protocol. But they do certainly accommodate for them, if you want to experiment. Chromecast devices will be able to display, but that can be hit or miss. We fully expect more devices to offer this as time goes on. We are the first to admit that many of the music streamers on our list are expensive.

Unfortunately, that’s just the nature of this particular product category. If you want this much technology in your life, you have to pay to play.

And if you really demand perfection, then the basic interfaces of Spotify, Tidal, or Apple Music aren’t going to cut it. You need a dedicated music interface — something that can handle both your digital library, and that of a streaming service. You need Roon, JRiver, or Audirvana. These dedicated software programs will not only let you extract the absolute most out of your audio, but will also give you a very pleasing interface to play around with.

You’ll notice in our comparison table above that we have a specific column for whether a particular streamer is compatible with Roon. There’s a very good reason for that. Roon is, by some margin, the most popular streaming interface on the market right now, with thousands of devoted users. On the surface, what it does is simple. It takes files from a given source, such as a hard drive or a streaming service, and relays it to what is known as a Roon Core — a complicated term for a music streamer that happens to be compatible with Roon ‘Roon Ready’ to use the technical term.

This means you don’t necessarily need to invest in an expensive music streamer to take advantage. If that was all it did, then we wouldn’t get nearly as excited about it as we do. Because what Roon does with its user interface is quite extraordinary. Instead of just displaying track information, it turns what you’re listening to into a fun, well-designed digital magazine, with a wealth of information about the artist.

Displayed on your phone, tablet, or PC, it’s an exceptional way to listen to music, and one that is highly rewarding. The downside? We’re not talking about iTunes here — this is not a free software program.

As such, it’s the kind of thing that only the most dedicated listener will want to go for. At the time of writing, there’s really no service on the market that can compete with the comprehensive nature of Roon, but there are options available — and many of them are significantly cheaper. Those looking for a Roon-like experience without the pricetag should consider something like Audirvana.

We may not be entirely sure how to correctly pronounce it, but it offers much the same experience that Roon does, albeit in a slightly clunky interface. The smart-asses among you are probably thinking that you don’t need a music streamer, because all you need to do is buy a wireless speaker or smart speaker to get the same effect. After all, if the definition of a music streamer is something that pulls audio from an external source, then surely wireless speakers count? It’s true: they do.

We didn’t say it was a perfect definition, but just because you can use a smart speaker as a music streamer doesn’t mean that you should. Here’s why. The music streamers on our list above aren’t concerned with actually playing audio.

They are not built to produce music through a set of speaker drivers. They are concerned with receiving audio files, and transmitting them to a separate destination in the cleanest and most efficient way possible, while providing as much information as possible.

That means that all the research and development performed on them has gone into this one goal, rather than trying to act as a set of speakers as well. Does this mean that only music streamers will satisfy? Of course not. If you’re on a budget, or want to simplify your life, then by all means invest in a wireless speaker or smart speaker. They will do an excellent job. It’s chalk and cheese.

And the point is this: music streamers are tools for those who demand the absolute best from their sound, and part of the way they achieve that is by focusing on a specific goal.

This doesn’t mean that you need to spend the earth — there are several affordable streamers on our list. But it does mean that, if you want to really boost your sound, you’ll need to invest in an additional set of speakers as well. Getting all the models mentioned here together in one place would have been tricky if weren’t for them. Go check them out. Step into the stream. Photo Credit. The Master Switch. By: Rob Boffard Last Updated: January 18, We use affiliate links and may receive a small commission on purchases.

Auralic Aries G2. See the Aurender A10 Best of the Rest 9. See the Andover Audio Songbird

 
 

 

Naim audirvana settings free.

 
Feel free to publish your own advert on our market. New offer New request search results (Page 1 of ). Feel free to publish your own advert on our market. New offer New request search results (Page 1 of ). Jan 18,  · Our Music Streamer Picks. Best Overall Music Streamer: Naim Uniti Atom A More Affordable Streaming Option: Cambridge Audio CXN (V2) Best Budget Music Streamer: Audioengine B-Fi Best High-End Music Streamer: NAD Masters M33 A Great Music Streamer for MQA: Bluesound Node 2i Plug-and-Play Simplicity: Xiaomi Mi Box S Best Music Streamer .

 
 

Naim audirvana settings free.

 
 

JRiver has more features, but you may not need them. As a UPnP server the sound quality advantage of Audirvana as a renderer is lost, and the only thing thing it has going for it that few others have is the incorporation of Tidal, Qobuz and HiRezAudio online streaming, including first MQA unfold on tidal, for anyone interested in those. And some people have reported a mismatch with Naim streamers and Audirvana as UPnP server, possibly because it is not a straightforward fileserver.

Rjt36 : I keep it as a backup, and benchmark, because it genuinely sounds great — better than the same Mac playing from iTunes. I play from backups stored on a USB-attached hard drive. Thanks ever so much to you all. I feel a bit out of my depth with all your extraordinary technical knowledge. But the organisation and visual representation of the nas drive and tidal on the Mac is quite nice. Is there a link or previous topic that might help me think about what I might need to do to get Audirvana to run as a renderer in the way described by members?

One additional wrinkle. You will sometimes see the term DLNA. This stands for Digital Living Network Alliance, and it’s an actual organisation with people who work in it. It was created to define standards for digital media transmission, and it uses — you guessed it — uPnP. We actually have a full explainer that breaks down not only how audio files work and what they’re made of, but just about every file type you can imagine. However, that explainer is for a much more general audience, and deals with file types you probably won’t find on many streamers such as straight-up MP3s, for example.

So, let’s take the time to very briefly explain what audio files are made up of, and which ones you are likely to encounter if you buy a music streamer. There are two main things you need to know about a music streamer, and those two things are the largest bit depth and sample rate it can take. Sample rate refers to the amount of times a computer has taken a digital snapshot of a specific second of a music file — obviously, the more snapshots it takes, the more detailed the audio will be.

You’ll find this measured in Hertz Hz , with the occasional abbreviation of kiloHertz kHz , or a thousand Hertz. Bit depth refers to how much information is found in each snapshot, and again, the higher the number, the better.

As you can imagine, those numbers are pretty good! There are many different types of audio files available, but the most common in the world of music streamers, we’d argue, are FLAC and MQA files. This is because these are the files used by the streaming service Tidal, which is easily among the most popular and wide-ranging high resolution streaming service — although it is being challenged by startups like Qobuz. This means they are both quick to stream, and suitably detailed.

It uses some truly magical digital wizardry to deliver a very high quality file that is also slim enough to be streamed without interruption. If you have a music streamer, these are the two file types you’ll encounter the most — although you may wish to experiment with DSD, which is a whole different ball game. Check out the explainer linked above for a full breakdown of that. When we talk about Google’s Chromecast and Apple’s AirPlay 2, we are referring to two different transmission protocols.

They are simple and effective ways of sending audio from a mobile device to a music streamer — or a TV, wireless speaker, or video streaming stick. However, that’s not the case. Both AirPlay 2 and Chromecast are available on multiple different streamer models and brands, and using either of them is as easy as selecting your streamer as a source.

It must be said that, for most music streamers, you won’t encounter either of them unless you absolutely want to. This is because most streamers on our list have the ability to access services like Spotify and Tidal direct, without having to rely on an external mobile device to do the streaming for them. As such, there’s no you need to use either transmission protocol. But they do certainly accommodate for them, if you want to experiment.

Chromecast devices will be able to display, but that can be hit or miss. We fully expect more devices to offer this as time goes on. We are the first to admit that many of the music streamers on our list are expensive. Unfortunately, that’s just the nature of this particular product category. If you want this much technology in your life, you have to pay to play. And if you really demand perfection, then the basic interfaces of Spotify, Tidal, or Apple Music aren’t going to cut it.

You need a dedicated music interface — something that can handle both your digital library, and that of a streaming service. You need Roon, JRiver, or Audirvana. These dedicated software programs will not only let you extract the absolute most out of your audio, but will also give you a very pleasing interface to play around with.

You’ll notice in our comparison table above that we have a specific column for whether a particular streamer is compatible with Roon.

There’s a very good reason for that. Roon is, by some margin, the most popular streaming interface on the market right now, with thousands of devoted users. On the surface, what it does is simple. It takes files from a given source, such as a hard drive or a streaming service, and relays it to what is known as a Roon Core — a complicated term for a music streamer that happens to be compatible with Roon ‘Roon Ready’ to use the technical term.

This means you don’t necessarily need to invest in an expensive music streamer to take advantage. If that was all it did, then we wouldn’t get nearly as excited about it as we do. Because what Roon does with its user interface is quite extraordinary. Instead of just displaying track information, it turns what you’re listening to into a fun, well-designed digital magazine, with a wealth of information about the artist. Displayed on your phone, tablet, or PC, it’s an exceptional way to listen to music, and one that is highly rewarding.

The downside? We’re not talking about iTunes here — this is not a free software program. As such, it’s the kind of thing that only the most dedicated listener will want to go for. At the time of writing, there’s really no service on the market that can compete with the comprehensive nature of Roon, but there are options available — and many of them are significantly cheaper. Those looking for a Roon-like experience without the pricetag should consider something like Audirvana.

We may not be entirely sure how to correctly pronounce it, but it offers much the same experience that Roon does, albeit in a slightly clunky interface. The smart-asses among you are probably thinking that you don’t need a music streamer, because all you need to do is buy a wireless speaker or smart speaker to get the same effect.

After all, if the definition of a music streamer is something that pulls audio from an external source, then surely wireless speakers count? It’s true: they do. We didn’t say it was a perfect definition, but just because you can use a smart speaker as a music streamer doesn’t mean that you should. Here’s why. The music streamers on our list above aren’t concerned with actually playing audio. They are not built to produce music through a set of speaker drivers.

They are concerned with receiving audio files, and transmitting them to a separate destination in the cleanest and most efficient way possible, while providing as much information as possible. That means that all the research and development performed on them has gone into this one goal, rather than trying to act as a set of speakers as well. Does this mean that only music streamers will satisfy? Of course not. If you’re on a budget, or want to simplify your life, then by all means invest in a wireless speaker or smart speaker.

They will do an excellent job. It’s chalk and cheese. And the point is this: music streamers are tools for those who demand the absolute best from their sound, and part of the way they achieve that is by focusing on a specific goal. This doesn’t mean that you need to spend the earth — there are several affordable streamers on our list. But it does mean that, if you want to really boost your sound, you’ll need to invest in an additional set of speakers as well.

And the best bit? That puts it on a par with Amazon, and much cheaper than Tidal and Qobuz. At launch, the company claimed that 20 million tracks were accessible in the highest quality Hi-Res Lossless format, with the whole catalogue following by the end of Having heard Apple’s Hi-Res Lossless catalogue, we can tell you that there’s plenty to get excited about — unless you just bought a new pair of AirPods.

None of them. We don’t blame you. Check out our guide for how to listen to hi-res audio on an iPhone. Like Amazon and Tidal, Apple Music also now has immersive audio tracks — this time through Apple’s proprietary Dolby Atmos-powered Spatial Audio format, designed to provide « multidimensional sound and clarity »; to deliver surround sound and 3D audio via your headphones.

The HomePod also supports Spatial Audio, so you can fill your room with virtual 3D sound from a single device. Another short answer: Deezer, Spotify and YouTube Music are yet to offer or even promise to offer hi-res audio. We know that Spotify is set to launch its long-awaited and seemingly delayed ‘HiFi’ tier which was promised by the end of but never materialised at some point, but it remains to be seen whether hi-res will be on the menu at launch or whether it will stick to CD quality — and if it will try to undercut the competition.

So will Deezer which offers CD-quality or YouTube Music which maxes out at kbps within its paid-for tier ever go hi-res? Alexander Holland, chief content and strategy officer at Deezer, offered some choice words on this last year: « Our goal is to make sure that Deezer brings value to both artists and music fans. We would never want to stand in the way of that. Ultimately, the delicate balance of budget and device compatibility within your home will determine which service you opt for.

Tidal is our current Award winner: it sounds that little bit better than the competition, the user experience is spot on, the catalogue extensive, and the accessibility of hi-res Masters streams on MQA-supporting devices is only growing. That said, it has yet to react to the latest price war on hi-res streams, bar setting up a free, ad-supported and lesser-quality tier in the US.

Qobuz is now a good shout for Sonos users looking to bring hi-res audio to their homes and it does have the biggest hi-res catalogue. Admirably, it offers users the chance to purchase and download music at a discount for Studio Sublime members , although we’d note the significant holes in its standard CD-quality album offering. Amazon Music HD has recently positioned itself as one of the cheapest hi-res options, and could well be the service of choice for non-Apple users who want the best sound for the least pound.

The downside is that even if you’re heavily ensconced in Apple’s ecosystem, you’ll still need to invest in third-party products to enjoy lossless and hi-res at their fullest. Got the service? Regarding unzip, please refer to the support page of Microsoft Windows. No, not exactly. The Cambridge Audio streamer can now be selected from the list of devices in your Roon system. DSD has a word length of only one bit and a sampling frequency of 2.

It supposed to also be able to transcode those file formats to DoP containing. It appears you’re still jumping to generalised conclusions about playback methodologies. This is now an additional selection in another section of JRiver again not as indicated under Schiit’s directions. Select Media Network on the left. You simply encode existing PCM content to DSD, get a few reviewers to proclaim it sounds better and DAC so and so, and presto, you have a rationale for people to buy new hardware – sheer marketing Thanks for the new ver.

I’ve was a long time JRiver user for my gigs of ripped CDs. Was this article helpful? The algorithm used in JRiver MC19 does a good job with maintaining classic measurement parameters like frequency response, dynamic range, and distortion from kHz – basically this means the math is as expected and fits the DSD output profile. It is used to re-route all the windows audios through JRiver Media Center. Good luck to you. Since your DAC only goes up to , you’ll need to use the resampling settings to convert that high sample rate down to , or , That saves space, so it works.

Protean Force. Browse and play your media, switch zones, edit playlists and metadata. Converting on Windows MachinesIntro Contents 1.

The 2nd aspect is why does Audirvana transcode to If you try to browse through NAS files from Sony menu, maybe the dsd files will not work. Note that the setup is completely different for directly connected DAC’s e. If your into that checkout sonore Ultrarendu and opticalrendu for enpoint. Solution 2. Windows ASIO setup. JRiver Media Center also enables hassle-free setup of DSD, the latest music encoding technology that offers 64 or times higher resolution than that of CDs.

The sound quality is pretty close to Jriver, with some tracks sounding slightly better on Roon and some better on JRiver. SonicOrbiter 2. A note about DSD audio. User Interface: 9. This is where I listen to surround recordings. The AL Convolver notes state « Asio inn and asio out only. I put 1. Foobar needed a couple of add-ons copied to its Components folder, while JRiver 18 will play DSD files without any additional add-ons.

I settled on using the Exasound e38 DAC, but it has analog line outputs and the receiver has no analog inputs. The Audio Device is set for default to Direct Sound because this way works almost in any case, with any unit connected to the computer, without any driver needed. Section 1 — Requirements to Get Started. Please visit the JRiver forum to learn more or ask questions. April I use JRiver. Lots of good info turning up in this thread. Reply 5 — VAC is intended to connect several audio applications together in real time.

If perfect audio is your goal Video. The sound is loud at 10 volume, when 50 volume should be medium and 10 quiet. Joe Vegna, Producer. Please post the complete output of that page. The problem is that seems multichannel driver for Windows didn’t released yet. Adding an inexpensive d-link dgs switch boosted the sound quality even more. I use this as my Media center for hi Rez bit perfect playback and video transcoding on the fly for multiple devices.

JRiver has 2 options. Organize, edit, and view your images. Latest Version:J. We will be using JRiver Media Engine Bricasti Design – DACs. Select « Options » from the drop down panel. Customizable media views.

Matt Ashland, JRiver. Download JRiver Media Center Jplay then passes the music across the ethernet link to the audiopc where it hands off the music to the kernel streaming dac driver. Technical Specifications. So for a 5. J River DSD configuration 1.

I actually have 2 different Matrix models and they do not have this problem with any DSD source material. I dont have any problems with pops or clicks as long as it is set up correctly within jriver. TN JRiver configuration for use with the Naim DAC-V1 JRiver JRiver is a licensed Jukebox style audio player for Windows which supports bit perfect playback of audio files including high sample rate, 24 bit and DSD files when used with an appropriate audio playback device that supports exclusive access mode.

Here is my plan. The domain jriver. As one DAC maker told me at an audio show where he was supposed to be demoing a competing product , JRiver – « It just works ». Optimal HQPlayer Settings5. WDM Driver is a built-in virtual audio driver. Open Preferences, navigate to Playback then Output. From the right pane of the Options window select Device Settings.

Focal Aria s driven with a Marantz PM Mack the Knife Louis Armstrong. Recently, I subscribed to Qobuz, which is fantastic! However, JRiver does not let you browse or even connect to Qobuz directly. The filters are equally great compared to Acourate but much easier to set up, especially for bass management.

The depth, the impact seemed to be missing. Jriver dsd setup Jriver dsd setup. DSD setup with Foobar is not for the faint of heart! The cheapest version will do. Then you really need to just install Audirvana.

I am running Audirvana on a Mac mini that is too old to run all the time. I was hoping to obtain better sound quality by using a stripped-down operating system rather than have Audirvana attempt to shut down all of the unnecessary applications.

I like Audirvana with Mac. Maybe they get it even better sounding in the future. Why looking at Roon, Audirvana sounds better. Daphile appears to be an alternative to Audirvana. Its webpage does not state anything about its being compatible with Audirvana. I like Audirvana, but am trying to find a way to make it a bit more convenient to use. Thank you again.